Search for: "People v David S."
Results 4241 - 4260
of 5,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2008, 3:13 pm
There is no reference to the Euro v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
Perry v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:39 am
Last week in US v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
Back in Europe, the Kat is pleased to note that David Musker's Class 99 design law blog has reached another milestone, securing its 550th email subscriber. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
Judge David Sentelle added, “You can’t regulate washing machines. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:40 am
I've always loved David's work but quite honestly I wondered what would draw him to tell that story. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
Comparative LawK585 .M478 2010Comparative law : historical development of the civil law tradition in Europe, Latin America, and East Asia / John Henry Merryman, David S. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm
V, XIV. “No person shall ….be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” [iv] David. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
(Though the children aren't mentioned by their full names, the plaintiff's last name is uncommon enough that some people searching for the children's names might come across the opinion.) [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:34 pm
This clarification of the Castle Doctrine is most welcome, since under the common law, (most recently outlined People (DPP) v Barnes) the position is not clear (see my previous blog). [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:21 am
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
Almost all of the MPs who spoke did so in opposition to the Government’s proposal, announced late last year, to bring forward measures to enfranchise prisoners serving less than four years in prison in response to two European Court of Human Rights (in Hirst v UK and Greens v UK) which have established that the current blanket disenfranchisement of prisoners is incompatible with the right to vote under the ECHR. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 12:45 am
" Zorach v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In Arakelian v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am
The application before Sir David Eady on 16 April 2015 in Watchtower Bible & Tract Society v Otuo was adjourned. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:39 am
If the Winkelmans lose, says Georgetown University Law Center professor David Vladeck, "it means these cases just can't be litigated -- not because they're not valid, but because they are brought by people of modest means. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 3:55 pm
The court then described the defendant's argument that summary judgment should not be given against it since there was a chance that it might unearth some evidence that showed that people would the presence of a CE mark as indicating consent to sell within the EU as "Micawberism". [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Excluding Transit Ads That "Contain Political Messages" Violates the First Amendment
14 Sep 2020, 12:21 pm
" And, as in Minnesota Voters Alliance, today's Third Circuit decision in Center for Investigative Reporting v. [read post]
