Search for: "People v High"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 15,043
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2019, 2:15 am
In Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming [2019] SGCA 11, the Court of Appeal was faced with an unusual clause: “This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of Singapore/or People’s Republic of China and each of the parties hereto submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Courts of Singapore/or People’s Republic of China. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm
Following the order, in 2012, Serafin became involved with Kolbe House, a care home for elderly Polish people, as a handyman. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 10:48 am
The DOJ is basing its claim on the US Supreme Court decision in Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm
Sensationalized coverage of high-profile trials may not reach jurors, but it reaches voters and DAs react to it. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:43 am
§ 3156) in United States of American v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens: Well, anybody who is able to wade through the entire book is entitled to high praise. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
This is the first part of today's little trilogy of FRAND-related posts.In early May, the Antitrust Division of the DOJ, under Qualcomm's former outside counsel and now-Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, filed an amicus brief with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California more than three months after the FTC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 12:57 am
Nearly all the pubs in the high street have gone and Hipster joints are starting to spring up. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:31 pm
(Id. at p. 671; see also People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:22 am
The high court decided to take a "categorical" approach to the problem. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State Justice… [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 8:23 pm
V, at p. 222). [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
On the same day, Richard Spearman QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) handed down judgment in the case of Otuo v The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society[2019] EWHC 1349 (QB) (heard 1-14 and 25 to 29 March and 1 April 2019). [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 12:55 pm
The case is Motala v The Master of the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Pozen is certainly correct that there is increasing discussion among academics and a few pundits and politicians about reforming the electoral college, but I think it remains to be seen whether it will genuine “gain traction” or simply founder on the shoals either of Article V, insofar as some of the proposed changes would undoubtedly require constitutional amendment, or on the determination by the Republican Party that the GOP probably benefits from continued… [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
The statements, widely quoted, were also tinged with irony, a large dollop of poking fun, and a bit of reaction:When asked if he thought China’s relationship with the US should be adjusted as globalisation has come under pressure, Xi said: “More than 10,000 people fly between China and the US on a daily basis, which is about 4 million [people] a year. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
The California Supreme Court’s 2008 opinion in Ross v. [read post]
