Search for: "People v. Render" Results 4241 - 4260 of 5,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 3:07 am by Adam Wagner
The statutory provision which defines the categories of people who have a right to take part in the hearings must be read to include anyone who has established family life with the child. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:43 pm by Big Tent Democrat
And if you decide that Chief Justice Marshall was wrong in McCollough v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 11:09 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s another case showing how American law applies to people with different cultural assumptions from our own, State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm by Stephen Page
Put simply, natural justice involves decision-makers informing people of the case against them or their interests, giving them a right to be heard (the hearing rule); not having a personal interest in the outcome (the rule against bias); and acting only on the basis of logically probative evidence (the no evidence rule). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:05 am by Steve Hall
Now those questions will get an unprecedented hearing in the middle of a current murder trial: on Monday, a judge will hear evidence in the case of Texas v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:40 am by Susan Brenner
All the meth dealers are doing is providing a service to people. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 12:04 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a decision on November 24, 2010, in a case styled, Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 12:04 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a decision on November 24, 2010, in a case styled, Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:30 am by GuestPost
Director of Public Prosecutions v Deirdre Clancy, Nuin Dunlop, Karen Fallon, Damien Moran, & Ciaron O’Reilly, On July 25th 2006, a Jury in Dublin Circuit Criminal Court voted unanimously to acquit five people charged with criminal damage to a US military transport plane at Shannon Airport. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:37 am by Lawrence Cunningham
Court: silence on how arbitration costs would be shared treated as “plainly insufficient” to render a contract unenforceable, with no recognition of such contract law basics. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:35 am by Andres
The case is that of Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2010] EWHC 3099 (Ch). [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 10:32 am by Nate Nieman
The Illinois Supreme Court invoked a seldom-used exception to the Fourth Amendment to reach its recent decision in People v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:06 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In addition, we conclude that the prejudicial effect of the evidence concerning the prior crimes outweighed its probative value (see generally People v Hudy, 73 NY2d 40, 55, abrogated on other grounds by Carmell v Texas, 529 US 513). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am by Richard Goldfarb
All of these steps, it seems to me, are things that people have been doing to mass produce food since the Industrial Revolution, but I find it hard to believe that adding in a substance that comes from nature and is produced using literally the first patent issued in the United States, which involves nothing more than the same steps I used to make short ribs, somehow renders it unnatural. [read post]