Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State" Results 4241 - 4260 of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
Municipal Securities/Public Pensions: In the Matter of State of New Jersey (Administrative Proceeding No. 3-14009): In the first cas [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Here, the affidavit states that Elrac is in the business of renting motor vehicles to the general public, that it uses rental agreements which are created in the regular course of business and that it rented the vehicle involved in the accident to Mr. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Iowa was the only state with a lifetime ban on voting for people convicted of a felony. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
He argued that by substituting the words "terrorist" for "dog;" "DHS" for "mom and dad" or "owners," and "the American public" for the "child," one creates the perfect counter-terrorism metaphor. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
Embassy in Baghdad, and prevent the Iraqi government from providing critical services to the Iraqi populace. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]