Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 7,625
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
Gaines v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am
On Saturday at 6 p.m., C-SPAN Radio will air the 1974 oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
The plaintiffs have told WorkCompCentral that even if they win at the summary judgment level it is still just "round one of a 10-round fight. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Nothing in the District Court’s opinion invalidates the D.C. ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Halbig v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
He is a patent attorney advocate and appeared in the Court of Appeal for England and Wales on Wednesday in Lantana Ltd v Registrar of Patents. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:51 am
Hershey Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:17 am
More importantly, if we are going to compare apples to oranges, the ACA’s Medicaid provisions have an explicit provision stating that if the state declines to participate, it loses the program funds (this was the provision at issue in NFIB v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
Briefly: At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses yesterday’s order directing Esteban Martinez to file a response to the state’s petition for rehearing in Martinez v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am
Tomorrow we will switch over to a twice-weekly (Tuesday and Thursday) format for the summer round-ups; daily round-ups will resume in the fall. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
MsLods’ news round-up: law+technology, 20 July 2014 Next week in the courts This is a busy week for the media courts with three trials taking place in London. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm
Department of Justice filed an amicus brief stating its view that the decision was wrong.This led to the second round of nuttiness: Judge Posner issued an order, out of the blue, to the Departments of Commerce and State, asking them to submit their own briefs—even though the Department of Justice is ultimately the legal representative of both agencies. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
Rudnicki v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
Rudnicki v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:53 am
Hobart Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
A California State University Professor studied 1,001 couples around the world who had reunited after divorcing. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
Last week, the BC Court of Appeal reversed the decision and released Ormiston v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* Retail omerta: Wilko v Buyology David pens a note on last week's High Court of Justice, England and Wales, decision in Wilko Retail Ltd v Buyology Ltd. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
