Search for: "STEVEN LITTLE" Results 4241 - 4260 of 4,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2007, 6:17 am
While addressing the judge on a point of law, he argues: 'Stevens v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:25 am
Rather than answer the government's question on harmless error, the Court (Stevens, J.) held there had been no error at all, since the indictment was not defective. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:23 am
Imagine not getting the local cop's police report in a simple felon-in-possession case, or no report disclosed in a little one-shot crack sale that goes federal. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:22 am
Present at the interview were myself (Michael Stevens - www.KentuckyLawblog.com and www.KyCases.com), Diana Skaggs, and Stan Billingsley. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:24 pm
AT&T may have paid little for its license, but the resultant leverage may have jacked up the price to second, and later, comers. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 8:18 am
" Okay, maybe the old man is losing it -- just a little bit. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 8:18 am
" Okay, maybe the old man is losing it -- just a little bit. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:30 am
Porcellio, a partner at Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman, reports on issues that include a discussion of a little-used provision that could result in treble damages against attorneys, Judiciary Law §487.   Toxic TortsTuesday, December 26, 2006By Philip E. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 7:43 am
Sometimes achieving a just result requires a little bit of a nudge, and that's where the pardon power comes in. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 8:15 am
From Washington Wire, here’s WSJ reporter Jess Bravin on President Ford and the Supreme Court: Reflecting on his legacy last year, President Ford wrote that "historians study the significant diplomatic, legislative and economic events that occurred during a presidential term to evaluate that presidency," with little consideration given to Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 9:28 am
Over and over again, capital punishment has been shown to have no or very little value as a deterrent. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 7:32 am
Early indications from my empirical research, however, suggest that the problem of the declining docket may get worse before it gets better, especially if Justice Stevens is the next member of the Court to retire. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 2:06 pm
   (That, indeed, is what Justice Stevens came right out and said.) [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 5:41 pm
The saga of who will represent re-indicted med pot movement martyr Ed Rosenthal just a got a little stranger. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 4:57 pm
John Paul Stevens– Willie Nelson. [read post]