Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 4241 - 4260 of 5,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2011, 3:10 pm by Dawn Goulet, Associate
  Touted as the most important search and seizure case the Court has heard in a decade, it will be interesting to see how the Bill of Rights has kept pace with ever-changing technology. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:39 am by Orin Kerr
All events will be held in Pound Hall: http://www.law.harvard.edu/about/map.html * * * * * * My own presentation will be the following: WHY COURTS CANNOT QUANTIFY PROBABLE CAUSE Orin Kerr The government can conduct almost any search or seizure if it has “probable cause. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The case focuses on the freedom from unreasonable seizures rather than unreasonable searches because the Court has already held, in Illinois v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The court of appeals ruled that the outstanding warrant and the prior seizure, “[i]n addition to the positive indication by the dog,” provided probable cause notwithstanding the possibility that a dog could alert to legal hemp. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Not that search and seizure law is crystalline in its clarity at present, but at least there’s one clear marker:  if the police violated the 4th Amendment, the evidence gets thrown out. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:38 am
The second search and seizure case out of the 8th last week, State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The ACLU argued that the police need a search warrant, but the Obama Administration said no, and filed a brief urging the Court to hold that police should have blanket authority to force blood tests without any search warrant. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:30 am by Sam Gustin
Visitors to the closed websites are now greeted with the following message from ICE: “This domain name has been seized by ICE — Homeland Security investigations, pursuant to a seizure warrant issued by a United States District Court under the authority of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:30 am by Abdo Law Firm
An article in the Washington Post, Aggressive police take hundreds of millions of dollars from motorists not charged with crimes, found: There have been 61,998 cash seizures made on highways and elsewhere since 9/11 without search warrants or indictments through the Equitable Sharing Program, totaling more than $2.5 billion. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:23 am by David Rangaviz
  And, even more broadly, the Court has recognized that proof of systemic racial discrimination must inform search-and-seizure jurisprudence, thus tying constitutional law to the lived reality of those who experience the criminal justice system. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:12 pm
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
15 May 2017, 11:16 am by MBettman
T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985) (the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to public school officials, but those officials may conduct warrantless searches of students so long as the searches are reasonable. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:00 am by Benjamin Herbst
There does not appear to be any physical evidence directly attributed to the two main defendants at this time (hence the conspiracy charges), though law enforcement did execute numerous search and seizure warrants and recovered a great deal of contraband. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:18 am by Cannabis Law Group
He or she may not be able to stop an investigation entirely, but the attorney will be able to protect your rights against self-incrimination and illegal searches and seizures. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:56 am by David Lat
Judge Matz [T]his Court is compelled to find that the Government team allowed a key FBI agent to testify untruthfully before the grand jury, inserted material falsehoods into affidavits submitted to magistrate judges in support of applications for search warrants and seizure warrants, improperly reviewed e-mail communications between one Defendant and her lawyer, recklessly failed to comply with its discovery obligations, posed questions to certain witnesses in… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:17 pm by LTA-Editor
Until the legality and acceptable scope of such surveillance is clarified, the StingRay is likely to remain a hidden threat to Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]