Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 8,516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
Stamer’s legal and management consulting work throughout her 27 plus year career has focused on helping organizations and their management use the law and process to manage people, process, compliance, operations and risk. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:37 am
He likes small airplanes. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Jacob: real consumers in the box are perfectly normal people. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:33 am
V. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:04 am
The Lackmans were self-described “tree people. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Last week marked the 10th anniversary of the US Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision known as Kelo v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
This morning, people in coffee houses and churches across the land will no doubt be talking about the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Baker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:27 pm
Virginia from 1967, Zablocki v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
He admitted that he knew his vehicle contained some drugs, but thought it was a small amount of marijuana.Too bad. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:45 am
In a small district you might have only one grand jury that meets once a week, and those grand jurors could, in theory, write things down in their notebooks and keep track of them over time. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:49 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 1:10 pm
Since the Supreme Court first ruled that a “public use” can be almost anything the government says it is, hundreds of thousands of people have lost homes or small businesses to blight and economic development takings. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm
In R(Alemi) v Westminster CC [2015] EWHC 1765 (Admin), which has been widely reported already (eg here; and all over my twitter feed), HHJ Blair QC found that Westminster’s allocation scheme was unlawful in disbarring successful homeless applicants (other than a small group) from bidding for social housing in their first 12 months on the list. [read post]
