Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 7,502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2014, 2:02 am
Section 9 – Jurisdiction This section puts barriers in the way of claim against persons domiciled in states which are not signatories of the Lugano Convention and not EU Member States. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
” OHIM rejected it as devoid of distinctive character. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 3:52 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia applied these principles in JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:48 am
Klinger v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
Initially the opposition was based on a whole host of grounds, starting with the Trade Marks Act 1996, section 8 on the grounds that BETPACK (i) did not fall within the definition of a trade mark, (ii) was devoid of distinctive character, (iii) consisted exclusively of signs or indications which may designate characteristics of the goods, (iv) was of such a nature as to deceive, (v) was such that its use would be prohibited by enactment or rule of law. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 11:30 pm
Daniels v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
There is, to be sure, tension between different parts of California—the communities that make up the large and densely populated metropolitan areas on or near the coast have very different demographic, economic, cultural, and political characters than do the smaller communities located in the more rural areas to the East and Far North of the State. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:54 pm
Mobley v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:11 am
(Eugene Volokh) Montgomery v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Citing Scott v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:58 am
Justice Harris' viciously proslavery opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
As held in People v Lewis, People v Ventimiglia, People v Santarelli and People v Allweiss, it is elementary that evidence of a defendant's prior criminal or immoral conduct is inadmissible if it cannot logically be linked to some specific material issue in the case. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 1:31 pm
Hagel, Amanatullah v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
The court therefore acted properly in ordering him to pay the fees under an account stated theory (Shaw v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
Ross v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
DD, who was not himself abused, stated that, upon approaching defendant's desk, he had seen defendant with his hand down MM's pants. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:30 pm
As the Supreme Court of Ohio said reversing a death sentence in State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
And the changing character of those interactions will only be definitively resolved after the fact in litigation. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
(Designers Guild Ltd. v. [read post]
