Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 29,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
& N.J., 162 AD3d 488; Jerez v Tishman Constr. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2006, 5:35 pm
Cole v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm
Miles.[10] At last count, 41 state attorneys general, including California, New York and Florida, have written to Congress to express support for the "Discount Pricing and Consumer Protection Act", S. 148, which is currently before the 111th Congress. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 12:39 pm
Everyone knows Erie's requirement that federal courts apply state substantive law in diversity cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
In some other states, in some kinds of cases, courts are allow to enforce contracts to the extent that they are reasonable. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 3:55 pm
Ring v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:32 pm
Reaching consistency throughout the different states seems unlikely. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:45 pm
The Court stated that If Congress tried to deny habeas corpus, there needed to be an adequate substitute in place in order to assure the prisoner a chance to prove that he was imprisoned by mistake. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:19 am
Anderson: States cannot disqualify candidates for federal offices from the ballot under Section 3. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 7:20 am
Pellegrino v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:04 am
United States (Fiduciary Trust) Caddo Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:29 am
" Congress chose these words, the Court said, because it was rejecting a competing rule, adopted by some state courts, that permits juror testimony to expose bias on the part of other jurors. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
On October 1, 2019, plaintiffs in Brackeen v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:08 pm
Department of Education of Massachusetts and Florence County School District Four v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the Department… [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
And that would result in less incentive for innovation than Congress wanted. [read post]
