Search for: "State v. Dominic"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 4,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2008, 5:50 am
Wade (and Doe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:38 am
TrafficSchool.Com, Inc. v. eDriver, Inc., 2008 WL 4000805 (C.D. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:31 am
Dominant Semiconductors Sdn. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:55 am
This is an outlook that not even the Supreme Court intended in R. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:10 pm
Family policy would no longer be inflected (if not dominated) by the debate over the democratic legitimacy of Roe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 10:14 pm
Yokel v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 5:09 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:50 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:53 am
National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 12:28 pm
In Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:02 am
Whether the district court erroneously applied Lozier v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 4:12 pm
In re-reading the Lincoln-Douglas debate at Freeport, Illinois, it occurs to me that Stephen Douglas ought to get credit for stating the essential Legal Realist position in 1858 -- more than a half-century before the classic statements of Realism in property law by Morris Cohen (Property and Sovereignty (1927)) or Erie v. [read post]
