Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 4241 - 4260 of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
  Shapiro happens to be a Russian-born, Canadian-naturalized lawful permanent resident (green-card holder) of the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
Holder, 13-471, involves a couple who fled the land of beer and bratwurst (no, not that one) after being fined and threatened with prison for home-schooling their children. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Petitioner’s reply Docket: 08-1498 ; 09-89 Title: Holder, Attorney General v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court held that the conviction was consistent with the First Amendment, as applied in Holder v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]