Search for: "State v. Main" Results 4241 - 4260 of 11,548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2017, 5:49 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  There are however, limits of the amount of punitive damages, when they are appropriate as held in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 3:57 am by Jan von Hein
It involves the actual pursuit of an economic activity through a fixed establishment in another Member State for an indefinite period (CJEU in Factortame and Others, C-221/89, para. 20 and Commission v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 6:56 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  A landmark opinion by the late judge Benjamin Cardozo, entitled Palsgraf v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:57 pm by Andres
When the relevant legal person carries out the main part of its activities in a different Member State from the one in which its registered office is located, that person may sue the alleged perpetrator of the injury in that other Member State by virtue of it being where the damage occurred. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 7:30 am by Garrett Hinck
The FTC is the main enforcement mechanism against companies carrying out unfair or deceptive trade practices. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 12:30 am by INFORRM
In Fuchsmann v Germany, the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that an entrepreneur’s Article 8 rights were not violated by the publication of an article linking him to Russian organised crime. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:00 am by Jenny Gesley
Article V states that the Treaty of Passau of 1552 and the Religious Peace of Augsburg (Augsburger Religionsfriede) of 1555 must be observed. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
(v) With a response dated 9 July 2012, referred to as "R3", the applicant filed amended claims of respectively a main and an auxiliary request, together with arguments. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Her rights derive from the two main precedents on abortion rights – Roe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Eric Turkewitz
But those of us in the trenches know otherwise, that this isn’t the main problem. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]