Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 4,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2009, 1:55 pm
The article traces the impact of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-212/97 Centros Ltd v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:56 am
Taylor v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 10:24 am
Finally, Part V provides for a short conclusion. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:12 pm
” Rosenblatt v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 2:27 am
Paduano v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:19 pm
United States Dept. of Interior, No. 08-30069 (5th Cir. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 2:29 am
Ashley County v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
If such provisions concern matters otherwise beyond Congress' legislative powers, the Constitution leaves their implementation to the States. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 7:44 am
The Washington Post has a recap on the proliferation of state anti-cyberbullying laws [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:39 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
State of Ohio, No.7-3808 (6th Cir. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 3:04 pm
Colacicco v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:49 am
The IPKat is really disappointed that this action is being brought in the United States and not in Europe following last month's Intel v CPM ruling (see IPKat here and here), where counsel on both sides could indulge in endless argument as to the state of mind of the relevant consumer, the likelihood of confusion and the extent to which the use of the mark on the t-shirt might be expected to affect the economic activity of consumers of the claimant's rolling… [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:17 pm
The decision at issue is Cipollone v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
The Supreme Court held 5 to 4 today in Altria Group, Inc, v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:11 pm
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court struck down the cigarette-makers’ claim that federal labeling laws preempted state-level action against the content of those labels. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:22 am
” Starbucks v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 2:08 am
On top of this, with the FTC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:22 am
Case Name: Belden v. [read post]
