Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 29,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 4:51 pm
In Feldman v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 4:51 pm
In Feldman v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:00 pm
Based on the decision in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 1:34 pm
Several Facebook users formally objected to the plan, arguing that it would violate state laws. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:01 pm
During the first trimester, regulations of abortion were presumptively invalid; during the second trimester, health regulations would be permitted but still subject to close judicial scrutiny; and only in the third trimester—after a fetus was “viable,” that is, capable of surviving outside the womb—was the state’s interest in fetal life deemed sufficient to justify abortion prohibitions, although even then there needed to be exceptions to any prohibitions when… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:49 am
The Fontaine Case as a Victory for Claimants In Fontaine v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:49 am
The Fontaine Case as a Victory for Claimants In Fontaine v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:02 pm
The conduct of our Assembly in preventing such men, (meaning such unqualified Voters) is similar to the conduct of Great Britain in taxing the colonies; and it is a right old Tory plan, (meaning that the said Laws were oppressive, unjust and tyrannical.) [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
David had no knowledge of Ingrid's plans, nor did he ever consent to L.S.' [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:49 am
And while State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:52 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Desmond v The Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police [2011] EWCA Civ 3 (12 January 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Guerrero & 30 Ors v Monterrico Metals Plc [2010] EWHC 3228 (QB) (15 December 2010) Ganz v Childs & Ors [2011] EWHC 13 (QB) (11 January 2011) Cambridge v Makin [2011] EWHC 12 (QB) (12 January 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Ferguson, R (on the application of) v Secretary… [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:42 am
Providence Health Plan Download Lone Star OB-GYN Assoc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
The IRS Guidelines are posted on the Internet at: New guidance released for retirement plans [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
This first post will discuss the overall biopharmaceutical market and the FTC’s stated theory of harm. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 3:39 pm
” Facts And Claims Alleged In EEOC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:23 am
Iran brought the case after President Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Iran nuclear deal (known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA) in May and revoked sanctions relief provided in the framework of the agreement. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm
The Appeals Court explains that two sets of petitioners, hereinafter referred to as "Industry Petitioners" and "Environmental Petitioners," seek review of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) final rule partially approving and partially disapproving the most recent revision to Texas's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) pursuant to the Clean Air Act… [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:10 am
Souter delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
