Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 11,370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 4:20 am
Above the Law, California Bar Examiners Stripped Of Authority To Determine Passing Score On State Bar Exam Daily Journal, State Supreme Court Says It Must Set Bar Exam Passing Score Stephen Diamond (Santa Clara), California Supreme Court Responds (Finally) to State’s Bar Exam Crisis Fleming’s Fundamentals of Law, Committee of... [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:05 pm
The California State Bar Court Review Department recommends Darryl Wayne Genis was asked by a superior court judge four consecutive times, in part and collectively, whether he had touched, moved, or hid opposing counsel’s document during a trial recess. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:49 am
He was a member of the American Bar Association Appellate Judge Seminar Series Planning Committee, the California Judges Association Ethics Committee, the Science and Law Steering Judicial Council Advisory Committee, and the Court Technology Judicial Counsel Advisory Committee.In 1995, he published a study of the tentative opinion program that he co-founded. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:26 am
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 347-48 (2011), the Supreme Court held that the FAA preempted California state law, which deemed such class-action waivers unconscionable in consumer cases. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:26 am
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 347-48 (2011), the Supreme Court held that the FAA preempted California state law, which deemed such class-action waivers unconscionable in consumer cases. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:13 am
This could create confusion in states in which the inevitable disclosure doctrine is not permitted by state law (e.g., California, Maryland, and Virginia). [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:42 am
• The right to file bankruptcy cannot be barred by contract or court order. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 2:42 am
A couple of weeks ago, Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Qualcomm's motion to dismiss the FTC's antitrust complaint. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:02 pm
The court stated that primary assumption of risk barred the plaintiff’s claims for negligence. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:16 pm
Van Dyke committed fraud on a court. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
Chase believed the 14th Amendment barred such discrimination by a state. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
Uber’s ongoing battle with Waymo in the Northern District of California federal court over technology used in self-driving cars provided another significant decision concerning the broad scope of trade secret preemption under California state law. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:38 am
They also showed that to meet special requirements in California, a muffler with no sharp edges was used in the same car. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
I hope more courts and Bars crack down on this kind of behavior. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
This post examines a recent decision from the California Court of Appeal – 2d District: Dove v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:57 am
The decision to represent these unpopular plaintiffs took courage and is an example of the highest traditions of the bar of this court. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
The surge in the number of federal court merger objection lawsuit filings is a direct result of a series of Delaware state court rulings, culminating in the January 2016 ruling in the Trulia case, in which a series of Delaware judges evinced their hostility to the type of disclosure only settlements that frequently characterize the resolution of merger objection lawsuits. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, is scheduled to hear a motion for preliminary approval of the record data breach settlement in the Anthem class action case. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
United States, 51 U.S. 109 (1850), the Court defines emoluments as “every species of compensation or pecuniary profit derived for a discharge of the duties of office” (emphasis added). [read post]
