Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 6,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2020, 7:20 am
Editor’s Note: This article is part of a three-part Lawfare series on how to address federal privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
The only difference discoverable between the two cases is, that each representative of the United States will be elected by five or six thousand citizens; whilst in the individual States, the election of a representative is left to about as many hundreds. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
” [via FindLaw] United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Future historians may credit the nomination and, if confirmed, the first Black woman on the United States Supreme Court, to President Joe Biden for fulfilling a campaign promise. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:40 pm
United States.. . . [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:47 pm
United States, 20-6387, involving prohibitions on delay in prosecution of criminal cases; three-time relist Allen v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:02 am
California, which required a warrant to search a smart phone incident to an arrest; and second, the concurrences of five Justices in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 6:35 am
I'll just state these as rhetorical questions. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
Gongadze v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 6:50 am
” This article will summarize the legal debate surrounding lie detection measures in the United States and explain why a technique like iBorderCtrl—if ever implemented in the United States—may avoid the legal pitfalls of other systems. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
” Eldred v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
The system was attacked as a violation of the separation of church and state in Zelman v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
EPA and Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
Maryland and recently reaffirmed by a majority of Justices in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:03 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesWhatsApp Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:06 am
That's all the proposed amendment to the statute would do: it wouldn't even import anything into patent law any more than you couldn import the Statue of Liberty into the United States: what's already there can't be imported. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 4:43 am
United States, 976 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
Supporting this conclusion, the Tribunal referred to other legislative changes in jurisdictions like the United Kingdom, United States and the European Union, where transsexualism was considered a form of sex discrimination. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
