Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 4241 - 4260 of 16,267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., No. 18-189 (Three good questions): Whether Administrative Patent Judges of the [PTAB] are principal Officers of the United States who must be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate under the Appointments Clause. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 10:46 am by Gene Takagi
Earlier this year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals upholds that objection and strikes the polygraph from the sentence.The case is United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:00 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia issued an order, in CREW v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Ronald M. Levin
Trump’s nominee to serve as the next chair of the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:43 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia issued an order, in CREW v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:19 am
On August 24, 2018, in a rare, 73-page decision interpreting the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 12:44 am by Florian Mueller
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to reconsider his decision to bar Huawei from enforcing a couple of Chinese patent injunctions prior to a San Francisco trial. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:30 am by Beth Graham
  In response, Sunbelt filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 8:00 am by Cyrus Farivar
"I've talked repeatedly in this hearing about how technology will be one of the huge issues with the Fourth Amendment going forward," said Kavanaugh, who serves on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
The sanction was imposed under the court’s inherent power to manage its own affairs, and specifically to sanction misconduct by an attorney that involves that attorney’s violation of a court order or other misconduct that is not undertaken for the client’s benefit (quoting United States v. [read post]