Search for: "v. AT&T Mobility" Results 4241 - 4260 of 5,406
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 7:05 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  In previous blog posts, our contributors have noted the significance of two Supreme Court decisions this term that will dramatically affect how employment class actions are prosecuted and defended – AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 2:02 pm
AT&T Mobility, the Southern District of New York decertified an FLSA class because the plaintiffs were unable to demonstrate a class-wide illegal policy or practice. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:14 am by Larry Ribstein
But the things that make me confident in that result—the briefs, the tenor of the oral argument, the language in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:03 am by Ted Frank
But the things that make me confident in that result—the briefs, the tenor of the oral argument, the language in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 6:46 am by Sergio Campos
 The first case, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 2:10 pm by Venkat
") As an update to that case, the court ruled that the claims were not subject to arbitration, but the defendant-ISP moved for reconsideration of this ruling in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:44 pm by Marie Louise
Don’t go there, says WIPO (IPKat)   Global – Copyright Is Google a ‘rogue’ website? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
 To support this contention, T-Mobile relied on a teleological interpretation of CAFA and a Sixth Circuit case, Freeman v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:42 am by Russell Jackson
In this respect, the settlement is an ingenious post-transaction way to prevent class actions without the use of a pre-transaction arbitration agreement such as the one used in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm by Michelle Lindo McCluer
  One such meaning, Kazin argued, is accompanying the force, citing Reid v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:49 am by Jon Hyman
If you need convincing, consider the recent Ohio appellate decision in Strodtbeck v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
(teleconference):  American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law, Private Advertising Litigation Committee, "In the Wake of AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:01 am by Paul Karlsgodt
David Waller, my partner at Baker Hostetler and hospitality lawyer extraordinaire, posted an entry in the firm’s Hospitality Lawg yesterday entitled AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:09 am by George
The real reason is simply because they don’t understand the traditional rules of ethics. [read post]