Search for: "Cash v. Cash"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 8,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2013, 4:12 am
In Harter v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:03 am
Cold hard cash. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 8:04 am
In this case, the defendant offered the plaintiff all the damages to which he was entitled under the Fair Debt Collections Act, totaling $1,000 in cash money. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
R (Eastenders Cash and Carry plc & Ors) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 – 28 November 2013. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:28 am
Bucaria, recently devised a novel solution in Digirolomo v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm
(Hint: the answer ain’t “fifty . . . .)United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
Easy enough, but what about non-cash items? [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:56 pm
In the ongoing qui tam case, US ex rel Baklid-Kunz v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:31 am
The issue in Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
Accordingly, the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment were denied (Eldredge v EdCare Management, Inc, November 21, 2013, Scola, R. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
A recent Tax Court case, Tucker v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:08 am
For another, it resonated with a recent Delaware Chancery Court decision in a dissenting shareholder case called Huff Fund Investment Partnership v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
R (Eastenders Cash and Carry plc & Ors) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 – 28 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
R (Eastenders Cash and Carry plc & Ors) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 – 28 November 2013. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller told Stocker he wanted to purchase the property with cash, but had run out of time to secure investors prior to closing and planned to pay off the loan within six months with investor funds. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
