Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 12,893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2015, 4:37 am
C. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 6:49 pm
" 28 U.S.C. 1453(b). [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 4:47 pm
§ 53(b). [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 11:51 am
Courts have refused to bestow this liability protection where companies have not strictly complied. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 5:03 am
Under EU trademark law, a trademark may be revoked if it becomes a misleading indication as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the goods or services it designates after the date on which it was registered, as a result of the use made of it by its proprietor or with its consent (Art. 58(1)(c) EUTMR and Art. 20(b) Trademarks Directive [“TMD”]). [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:19 am
Courts have refused to bestow this liability protection where companies have not strictly complied. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 5:03 am
Under EU trademark law, a trademark may be revoked if it becomes a misleading indication as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the goods or services it designates after the date on which it was registered, as a result of the use made of it by its proprietor or with its consent (Art. 58(1)(c) EUTMR and Art. 20(b) Trademarks Directive [“TMD”]). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:52 pm
Code § 10139.5(c)(5). [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
This exemption is available to a U.S. based adviser of “private funds”– an issuer of securities that would be an investment company but for the exceptions provided for in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“ICA”) Sections 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7)– with a combined AUM of less than $150 million. [read post]
13 May 2009, 12:28 pm
While Brown was employed at UCC, she was subjected to a daily pattern and practice of sexual and racial discrimination, harassment and retaliation as a result of serious and pervasive sexual and racial discrimination and harassment against Latina workers resulting in a sexually and racially hostile work environment, including but not limited to: a) Defendant Paul Smith vocally announced on many occasions on the work floor to the Latina workers that as the owner he had the right to demand and expect… [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
§ 343(w)(1)(B)]. [read post]
26 May 2021, 11:48 am
Endorsement 13 said “Exclusions A., B., C. and D. . . . are deleted in their entirety and replaced” with a new list of exclusions labeled “A,” “B,” and “C. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:42 am
Class B models, branded “ERA”, are about the size of panel trucks. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am
B/c the contribution to the joint tort car accident is a one-off, it may not transfer well. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:29 am
(c) their being potentially highly efficient to tax. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 8:41 am
SVOX also had no shareholders during the time period covered in Fuqua’s complaint.The case is No. 14 C 216. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 12:21 pm
The committee will review and discuss the recommendation and decide whether to: a) proceed to Step 4; b) jump to Step 5 or; c) take no action at the present time. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
P. 23(c)(4). [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See NY S.B. 8305-C . [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:47 pm
While Section 503(b)(1)(B) of the Communications Act authorizes the FCC to penalize any person who violates the Act or the FCC’s Rules, neither the FCC’s Rules nor its forfeiture guidelines establish a base fine amount for specific EEO violations. [read post]
