Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 13,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
The US Supreme Court indicates a warrant should be obtained before the routine taking of blood in DWI Missouri v McNeely 133 S. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 10:10 pm
The only “administrative record” that this Court could even arguably consider consisted of several brief letters that largely concern procedural matters and a few, simple, standard forms completed by Plaintiffs. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
In a memorandum opinion in Kersey v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit 1975).U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 10:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 3:04 pm
In Insurance Institute of Michigan, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 3:45 pm
In State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office et al, Docket No. 1:21-cv-00899 (E.D. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Criddle, Evan J. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
The court reversed the Office of Administrative Law and the trial court, and concluded that the Commission’s policy was an invalid underground regulation. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:30 pm
Way back last June, I wrote about the significance of the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in Watters v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
The 186th edition of the IPKat’s news roundup.DesignsKat friends Nina O’Sullivan and Victoria Wilson reported on the 2017 key design cases brought before both the EU and the UK’s courts in The best and the brightest: key UK and EU design decisions from 2017.Speaking of key decisions, following the DOCERAM v CeramTec CJEU judgement (C-395/16), Kat friend Alexander Haertel discusses the decision in detail and its possible repercussions in German design law on the… [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 10:24 am
Inc., v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 12:47 am
Supreme Court (SC) in Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
McVey v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:38 am
The justices had considered the case of White v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:05 am
In Albert Mancini v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:29 am
To discuss your benefits claim with one of our skilled attorneys, contact our office at (781) 843-2200 or online and schedule a free consultation. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:03 am
But, doubtful readers, rest assured that Terry v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:38 am
Bush Administration, but it was embraced by the Obama Administration when it came into office, even as the new Administration sought to make somewhat narrower claims for presidential detention power than had the Bush government. [read post]
