Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 12,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2020, 7:17 pm
During the attack, the victim said “I don’t know who you are. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
It does not want Georgia to change the rules in the middle of the game. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
It does not want Georgia to change the rules in the middle of the game. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 3:19 am
As I also noted, having more than one crime in a single count can make it difficult for a defendant to claim double jeopardy if he’s prosecuted for one of the crimes later; if the count in the original indictment charged Defendant Doe with crimes A and B and the jury simply convicts him on that count, did they convict him (i) of crime A (only), (ii) of crime B (only) or (iii) of both crimes A and B? [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
I welcome guest posts from responsible commentators on topics relevant to this blog. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Bennett and McComish v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:55 pm
Nor does it incorporate state administrative penalties, such [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Defendants offer no basis on which to find otherwise, and I am aware of none. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am
Nowhere does he suggest that the person at the table should be a public defender. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
The court has therefore had to develop its own practice through its case law. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:32 pm
A winning defendant almost never does. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:01 am
Bryant v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:39 pm
Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 3:47 am
Where Does Yu, and Where Do We, Go From Here? [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:50 am
Note: For those lawyers among our readers, the District Court decision is Justin Goldman v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
In the most recent case of LaserDynamics v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:00 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 2:01 pm
Underwood v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
I doubt I will be quite so prolific this week as I am going to be back on a suppression hearing on Tuesday and maybe Wednesday in People v. [read post]
