Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 8,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 9:44 am
For more on the history and significance of initiatives, check out the Initiative and Referendum Institute.The significance of the right of initiative and referendum was not lost on the California Supreme Court in the decision of Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v The Superior Court S207173. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm
The Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al., Real Parties In Interest (2014) ___ Cal.4th ___, Case No. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
On appeal, he argued that the Wake County Superior Court Judge who presided over the trial “erred in allowing testimony of a detective concerning his opinions, decisions, observations, and interpretation of text messages” and that the judge also erred in admitting photographs of certain text messages. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Kastigar v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 11:24 am
Martin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently decided a non-precedential high-conflict custody case in J.W.I. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:27 am
What happens after the fact – how does any observer, whether the international community, the commander’s superiors, a court or international tribunal, assess this proportionality process? [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
In the case, Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
The general counsel or claim manager needs to accurately estimate a range that will be on his or her check, before he goes to his superiors for settlement authority. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 9:57 am
The most difficult case for the court to harmonize is State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am
While of course the courts have superior authority to the tribunals, they have also recognised the specialist expertise of such tribunals in the past.Hogan J. also does not refer to Dubyna v Hourican Hygiene (2005) UD 781/2004, another EAT case in which it was found that a contract in breach of the Employment Permits Act 2003 was enforceable where the employee was unaware of the breach. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Superior Court of Sacramento County, the appellate court held that the trial court could compel a juror to disclose the juror’s Facebook postings. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
This case came to trial against the background of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:12 pm
See Collins v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 11:17 am
In Pippins v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:38 am
In Millliken v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:23 am
American Meat Institute v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
The DGCL does not require a corporation to call a special meeting at the request of stockholders. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 6:18 am
Maya v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am
Neither, they say, does the Supreme Court. [read post]
