Search for: "Does 1-75" Results 4261 - 4280 of 4,860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2010, 5:44 pm
”) (quoting Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 56, at 373-75 (W. [read post]
We will address in later sections of this paper how shareholder choice should be implemented and whether and under what circumstances shareholder choice might or should be circumscribed. [1] Paradigms for Shareholder Choice; Purpose of Proxy Access There are two fundamental paradigms for integrating shareholder choice into a proxy access regime intended to make proxy access available at public companies subject to Commission proxy access rules. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 12:47 pm by Josh Wright
Childers, Measuring Compliance with Compulsory Licensing Remedies in the American Microsoft Case, 76 ANTITRUST L.J. 239 (2009) Alan Devlin, The Stochastic Relationship between Patents and Antitrust, 5(1) Journal of Competition Law and Economics 75 (2009). [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 11:02 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
A Pennsylvania appellate court heard arguments in Wyeth’s challenge to the verdict on Dec. 1. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:27 pm
Example: Patient pays Integrative Care Center or Medical Spa $100, and Center or Spa pays Doctor $75. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 7:01 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
But as the roadblock took shape on I-75 shortly after midnight on Oct. 1, 2007, traffic did not simply slow down. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 5:46 am
Using this formula the IRS can take as much as 50-75% of your paycheck. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm by admin
Click Here David Shestokas: Warming treaty does not give up U.S. sovereignty. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:36 am by admin
Pfizer lost: it spent $294 million on a property that is now vacant and on which it will lose $75 million or more. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:39 am by J
When a Magistrates' court makes a stand alone ASBO (s.1(1), Crime and Disorder Act 1998), appeal (by way of re-hearing) is to the Crown Court. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:39 am by J
When a Magistrates' court makes a stand alone ASBO (s.1(1), Crime and Disorder Act 1998), appeal (by way of re-hearing) is to the Crown Court. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:10 pm by Armand Grinstajn
Since the parent application as originally filed does not refer to CDRs according to Chotia, the divisional application contains subject-matter going beyond the content of the earlier application as filed and does not meet the requirements of A 76(1). [25] To read the whole decision, click here. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:55 pm by Bartolus
It had failed amend those agreements to include stipulations to include possible exceptions, as required by Articles 64 §2 TFEU (ex Article 57 §2 EC), 66 TFEU (ex Article 59 EC) and 75 §1 TFEU (ex Article 60 §1 EC). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:00 pm
Last week, we shared with you a very interesting internal document from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett: a collection of notes or informal minutes from a June 2009 partners' meeting. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:55 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
 Does the section convey that once the director is appointed as recorded in the minutes, then, such an appointment should not be questioned? [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:48 am by Durga Rao
(1) How to construe the wording “kept in accordance with the provisions of section 193”? [read post]