Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 76,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
The CJEU today (in case in C-421/13, Apple Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt, see here) confirmed that the representation of the layout of a retail store, such as the one depicted below, may - subject to certain conditions - be registered as a trade mark. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:33 am
Dundas v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
Not for now, though, and if one judge on the panel in State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 11:50 pm
I’ve had a lot of request for the concluding points I made about what employers should do while we are waiting for the California Supreme Court to determine whether or not it will review the Brinker v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:41 am
Cusson and Grant v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 5:10 pm
Today the Supreme Court of California issued its much-looked-for decision [warning, pdf] in Barrett v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:58 am
It is particularly satisfying that the profit margin remains gratifyingly good, due to a combination of keeping our fees reassuringly high and staff salaries sensibly low. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:12 pm
This could be a wacky case like Adlerstein v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:22 am
There's been a lot of discussion of the oral argument in FCC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 3:30 am
Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 5:55 am
Diesel S.p.A. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:00 am
According to the Swiss Court the presentation of the food packaging, which boasts a “V” symbol denoting that the items are vegan, means that the use of animal names is not creating confusion among consumers. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:03 am
The Clorox Company v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:24 am
The New York Times reported over the weekend on the case of Cussler v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:29 pm
Barbosa v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:29 am
For judgment, please download:[2014] UKSC 5For Court’s Press Summary, please download: Court’s Press SummaryFor a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R v Mackle (Nos. 1, 2 and 3), and R v McLaughlin (Northern Ireland) [2014] UKSC 5 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:52 am
Supreme Court in the case Paterson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 11:59 am
The case formally remains good law, although it generally gets taught along with Terminiello v. [read post]
