Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 5,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 5:27 am
Fortunately, People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:27 am
Fortunately, People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:40 am
Doe v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:58 am
But the English case law has to date focused on deprivation of property, he said, and has not recognized any equivalent principle to that enacted in section 365(e) of the Code. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 7:25 am
The style of the case is, Antonio Trevino v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 am
“[T]he domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:39 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:38 am
Here, the repayments were made on the same day directly to the holders and not through a more “traditional” or formal DTC settlement process. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:38 am
Here, the repayments were made on the same day directly to the holders and not through a more “traditional” or formal DTC settlement process. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm
Holder). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:08 am
This was one of the main reasons relied upon by the Judge in OTG v Barke. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 6:07 am
He suggests a potentially simple review mechanism in the event that they refuse to do so, with the onus being on the rights holder to justify the refusal and a license being deemed to have been given upon request in the meantime provided the Board has been notified of the refusal. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 10:27 pm
He suggests a potentially simple review mechanism in the event that they refuse to do so, with the onus being on the rights holder to justify the refusal and a license being deemed to have been given upon request in the meantime provided the Board has been notified of the refusal. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:52 am
It described the section as putting the matter to the patentee's (or in this case, exclusive licensee's) election: “if he wants damages for the non-registration period he must forego costs; if he wants costs then he must forego damages for the period of non-registration. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:50 am
Upon such performance, he becomes vested with equitable title to the property. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
” See: Gomes v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:52 pm
AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:18 am
Domain names are not place-holders for trademarks. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:28 pm
" He continued, “We saw the same conclusion reached in Perry v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:33 pm
207/10, Orifarm v Merck Sharpe & Dohme; Paranova v Merck Sharp & Dohme, sped through in pretty good time. [read post]
