Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 19,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2009, 1:18 pm
We don’t usually cover gypsy & traveller planning permission cases, since they tend to turn on their own facts, but Rafferty and another v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2009] EWCA Civ 809 has one point of wider importance. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 1:14 am
ARCHAIC DEATH MACHINERY ABOLISHED ---- For immediate releaseACLU Nebraska and Nebraskans Against the Death Penalty heralded theNebraska Supreme Court's opinion issued today in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 10:31 am
The decision was made two months ago, but I think the written opinion has just become available, as GW v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm
United States, which relied on an earlier First Circuit decision (United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:39 am
The IPKat posted a report earlier this week of the case Hospira v Cubist, in which three patents belonging to Cubist were revoked by Mr Justice Carr. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:57 am
I’ve discussed those defenses before in a series of posts onKamakahi v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In LePage v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 7:47 am
Mogull v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:48 pm
v=POwrbFrJADU Briefing highlights: Katitza Rodriguez, Policy Director for Global Privacy, EFF One big issue we're facing is that there isn't an effective global system in place to make sure human rights are enforced. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Indeed, particularly in recent decades, the law of defamation has evolved to provide more adequate protection for freedom of expression on matters of public interest”. [19] She discerned a general trend towards revising the law of defamation to provide more protection for freedom of expression which could be observed in England, Australia, New Zealand, United States, Germany and the European Court of Human Rights: “What is of interest for my purposes is not so… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Under Sosa v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:03 am
Scarlet v SABAM The SABAM is the Belgian equivalent of PRS, a royalty collecting agency representing music artists. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
Three more amicus briefs have been filed in Winter v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:40 am
The issues for the Supreme Court to decide included whether ECHR, art 2 imposed an obligation on the State to take preventative measures to protect a voluntary mental patient against a risk of suicide, whether the appellants were “victims” under ECHR, art 34 and the Human Rights Act 1998, s 7(7), and, if so, had they lost that status on settlement of a negligence claim brought on the same facts, and whether the s 7(5) time limit for raising a Human Rights Act… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:28 am
That year, in Coker v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:51 am
Greenwood, the Supreme Court decided… In California v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
Cambridge Human Resource Group, 292 Ill. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
