Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 6,188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2011, 6:32 am
The parties must co-habitate as husband and wife after agreeing among themselves that they are husband and wife. 4. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:39 pm
Jarman pointed out the folly of the airline’s directive and the awkward position of a divorced spouse who must count on her former husband/wife to pay out the pension or her former husband/wife’s new partner. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 2:38 am
Halawy, reversing a temporary order providing for child support, but failing, evidently, to divide the Husband’s net monthly income by the combined net monthly income, per F.S. 61.30(9). [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 9:23 am
The appellants are the personal representatives of the estates of a husband and wife who were killed in a motor vehicle accident caused by a third party driver who also died in the accident. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:22 am
By Daniel RichardsonCote v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:34 am
By Daniel RichardsonIannarone v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:38 pm
By Daniel RichardsonRBS Citizens, N.A. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm
In Cohen v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 12:07 pm
Review Granted Marriage of Valli, S193990—Review Granted—August 24, 2011 The issue is whether a life insurance policy on the husband’s life that lists the wife as the policy owner, but is taken out jointly by the husband and the wife, is the wife’s separate property under the “form of title” presumption. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:44 am
So when the public recognizes the universal importance of maintaining, protecting, and promoting society’s most foundational institution as the exclusive union between a husband and a wife, we should proceed with extreme caution and trepidation at the prospect of creating a new “fundamental right” to same-sex “marriage” in our Constitution. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:49 pm
The Appellate Division also found it was improper to consider texts by the husband's current wife as evidence of harassment, since there was no evidence that the husband directed his current wife to act on his behalf. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:23 pm
Sellers in which the lower tribunal was reversed both for denying permanent periodic alimony and for evidently granting lump sum alimony instead in the form of the Husband’s share of the marital home. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:49 pm
In the case of Raprager v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:51 am
Department of Justice] United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 7:48 am
Jacobsen v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 3:54 pm
A calculation of spousal support under the Guidelines is based on the payor’s gross income (usually the husband) and the wife’s gross income, including common law spouses in most Provinces. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
In pertinent part, DOMA defines marriage for federal purposes as “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
In pertinent part, DOMA defines marriage for federal purposes as “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:35 pm
See Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 1:13 pm
Wife, of course, replied and plead the Separation Agreement as a bar to Husband's claim for equitable distribution. [read post]
