Search for: "IN RE: ENGLAND"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 4,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2009, 12:33 pm
You’re a Eurasian spy! [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:54 am
A new milestone for our court directory - we now have 6000 courts in our database - see below.There's about 1500 in NY; 240 in CA; about 200 in the New England states (MA, CT, RI, VT and NH - we haven't done Maine yet); 600 in NJ; 168 in FL; GA has 500 and we're still adding more; 132 in Illinois; nearly 300 between MD, VA and DC; 220 in NC; roughly 600 apiece in Ohio and PA; and there's [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
Any modification of an existing instrument carries with it an inherent degree of legal uncertainty, by requiring existing case law and commentary to be re-appraised in light of the change. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that! [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:50 pm
And we're buying into it by letting them play along with us. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
Among those areas with the highest care costs, New England states are near the top along with California, Oregon and Washington. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 4:27 am
So we're going to encourage them to commit suicide by Military Commission. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:28 am
As this court explained in New England Braiding Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:32 pm
There is currently a major re-organisation of tribunals in England and Wales and, broadly, the intention is to bring them all together in one structure whereby there will be a number of different “Chambers” with first-tier and upper-tier tribunals. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:05 am
See, e.g., In re New England Fish Co., 19 B.R. 323, 328-29 (Bankr. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:31 am
In the (re)insurance market, many policies provide for an arbitration before a panel including a QC and before a single QC as arbitrator. [read post]
31 May 2009, 7:33 am
Whether you’re a fan of the work of Jane Austen, George A. [read post]
30 May 2009, 7:02 pm
Those still matter, but they're not enough. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:58 pm
We corrected a typo in the quote - just in case you’re tempted to Google the quote. [read post]
29 May 2009, 10:04 am
Advocates of legal restraint in some ways are eager to point to places like England and Canada, which have cost rules, caps on damages, and other legally imposed mechanisms that reduce access to justice but are argued to enhance social efficiency; so why do they not look through the same lenses at the Canadian and English health care systems? [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:05 pm
Napolitano (May 20, 2009)(PDF), which has elegantly struck down the “widow penalty” here in New England. [read post]
25 May 2009, 8:31 am
So, as in all other aspects of the modern administrative state, we're really talking about the ability of the President to "delegate" such decision-making authority to a small group of men and women who will know, presumably, that they won't have to defend their decisions before anything that might be described as a traditional Article III court applying traditional legal standards.2. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
After Defendants had completed four shipments, and received approximately $9.5 million in proceeds, customs officials in England intercepted a shipment. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:35 am
Cecil and Willging quote a federal judge as saying the following, when explaining why he or she dislikes independent experts: "We're conditioned to respect the adversary process. [read post]
20 May 2009, 11:33 am
The rest, from the small New England prep school my parents sent me to, are scattered all over the globe. [read post]
