Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*" Results 4261 - 4280 of 6,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
(And as a practical matter, anti-Mexican and people-of-color immigrant; Sheriff Joe and the boys weren't going to be searching for undocumented French Canadians.) [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm by Richard Hunt
All you need to know about the industrial nature of this litigation is that the total attorneys’ time was 2.2 hours and that 14 different legal assistants billed time to the matter. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
This, of course, raises the question of who should decide this matter: the states or the nation’s highest court? [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am by Alex Phipps
The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the matter to the trial court. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Bexis
  That was back when it still mattered a great deal, so at least its done some good in the meantime.Smith was decided on Anti-Injunction Act grounds. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
At its September 30, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the termination of parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act, the constitutionality of Virginia’s “crimes against nature” statute, protections on free speech interests of government employees, and a free exercise challenge to workers’ compensation requirements. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
”Most Americans do not have a meaningful opportunity to emigrate, mostly as a financial matter but also for any number of personal reasons. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
But that procedural matter struck me as a bit too inside-baseball to blog about, especially since I knew that this brief was forthcoming. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/824916.co1.pdf In a dissent, Justice Charles Johnson argued that the lead opinion’s allowance of an attenuation exception to the exclusionary rule “effectively removes the incentive for police officers to secure a warrant before invading a citizen’s home and offers no remedy for the constitutional violation. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 4:46 pm
I have indicated in class that POW status gives a detainee significant benefits - interrogation must be limited to merely name, rank and serial number; treatment in detention must be generally as good as that of soldiers of the "Detaining Power," trial for war crimes or other matters must be (with some legal limitations; I am sliding over some things legally) the same as court martial for the Detaining Power's own soldiers, etc. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:41 am by Emma Snell
’s next Prime Minister after former prime minister Boris Johnson announced that he was dropping his bid to return to power. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
Members of Congress seem to have thought it mattered. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am by Josh Blackman
[If Trump’s speech is protected by the First Amendment, then incitement cannot be grounds for impeachment. ] [This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Over the past four years, we have defended many of President Trump's actions as a constitutional matter, while criticizing those actions as a policy matter. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:12 am by Lovechilde
Bain and its shareholders profited in the end, no matter what else happened. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Well, the truth of the matter is it’s been used a lot and it’s saved a lot of lives. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:48 pm by INFORRM
If one judges the British press by the standards of the Fourth Estate – and, again, it’s a perfectly simple matter to adumbrate these (take a look at page 3 of David Randall’s wonderful book The Universal Journalist, for example) – much of what appears in the British press just isn’t journalism at all. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:04 pm by SO Issues
If anything, however, he made matters worse for [name withheld], who went to trial in 1999. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am by Andrew Frisch
Specifically, the court in Caley did not address whether the right to proceed collectively under the FLSA may be waived as a matter of federal law. [read post]