Search for: "In Re Kennedy" Results 4261 - 4280 of 4,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
SOTOMAYOR: ... enormous changes in our society, many, many cases looked at by the Supreme Court addressing the application of the death penalty, addressing issues of its application and when they're constitutional or not. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Today, Justices Ginsburg, Kagan, Sotomayor, Kennedy, and Breyer, with Justice Thomas concurring, denied defendants the option of arguing that because the named plaintiff did not accept a full settlement offer under Rule 68 before filing the motion for class certification, he or she does not have a sufficient interest in the controversy to create jurisdiction under Article III of the U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
Or maybe Chief Justice Roberts was weary with Justice Kennedy always being the swing vote. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Kennedy, J put it thus in a different context from the present in an oft cited dictum in R v London Borough of Hillingdon, ex p Tinn (1988) 20 HLR 305 at p 308: “As a matter of common sense, it seems to me that it cannot be reasonable for a person to continue to occupy accommodation when they can no longer discharge their fiscal obligations in relation to that accommodation, that is to say, pay the rent and make the mortgage repayments, without so straining their resources as to… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:19 pm by Venkat
Majority: Justice Kennedy wrote that "speech in aid of pharmaceutical marketing ... is a form of expression protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
After the rash of articles crowning him as the Court's new swing Justice, you might be surprised that Justice Kennedy still has to write dissents. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:08 pm by Jamison Koehler
Fiat justitia caelum ruat even finds its way into movies, such as the Oliver Stone 1991 film JFK in which New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison (Kevin Costner) uses the phrase during his investigation into the assassination of President Kennedy. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
Justice Alito wrote the opinion of the court, and was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 12:27 pm by Richard D. Friedman
And often they understand that their chance of reaching an acceptable plea bargain will be substantially impaired if they’re perceived as game-playing in hopes of imposing costs on the prosecution. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  The judge in the case of “In re Yahoo! [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:53 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
So, I may have several search strings like: Smith AND [misappropriat* OR stole OR steal* OR (customer w/3 list) OR (client w/3 list) OR fire OR terminat* OR discipline* OR suspend* OR resign* OR unemploy*] between 1/1/08-1/1/10 (Kennedy OR Jones OR Adams) AND (fire OR terminat* OR discipline* OR suspend*) between 9/15/09-10/15/09 Smith AND [perform! [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm by Steven G. Pearl
” Brief for Secretary of Labor as Amicus Curiae in In re Novartis Wage and Hour Litigation, No. 09–0437 (CA2), p. 11. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  Predictions (and that’s what we’re talking about here) are always based on how one perceives and understands how the world and the actors in it operate. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
 It will be re-fixed for a later date. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:54 am by joe bahgat
Shortly after I posted about the FCC's broadcasting indecency policy heading to the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
If you like voting cases (if, say, your name is Rick), well, you’re in luck. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:03 pm by MBettman
Dep’t of Natural Res., 62 Ohio St. 2d 138 (1980)( The purpose of the immunity is “to encourage owners of premises suitable for recreational pursuits to open their land to public use without worrying about liability. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
But simply allowing those claims to be adjudicated on the merits in Federal court will go a long way to preserve the legitimacy in criminal justice in a case in which a man's life is at stake.Then I was going to quote a brief exchange between Justices Ginsburg and Kennedy and John Neiman, Jr., Alabama's Solicitor General.JUSTICE GINSBURG: Did you oppose it? [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 12:43 pm
Yesterday, Representative Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as lead sponsor together with more than 90 co-sponsors introduced H.R. 3567 in the House of Representatives. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:21 am by MBettman
Dowling violates the Double Jeopardy clause because allowing acquittal evidence to be used in a subsequent criminal case forces the accused to re-mount a defense to charges on which he has already been acquitted. [read post]