Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 4261 - 4280 of 10,682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
It has been alleged in High Court that James Murdoch was personally involved in authorising the deletion of emails at News International in early 2010 when the phone-hacking scandal was taking off. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 8:22 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
“United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Abdul Kadir Mohamed… v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 8:22 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
“United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Abdul Kadir Mohamed… v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
And April Doss defended the 9th Circuit’s reading of the government’s ability to use information collected through 702 surveillance in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am by INFORRM
In R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3, Baroness Hale noted that Article 8 had been held to include the right to establish and develop relationships with others. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
James, 424 Mass. 770, 778 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1997). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
Today’s live blog team comprises Lucy Hayes (Olswang), Anna Phillips (Nabarro), James Gliddon (CMS), Tom Sandeman (Nabarro), Emma Boffey (CMS) and Iona Millership (Olswang). 16.00 The Lord Advocate has now concluded his submissions for today. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 4:49 pm by Tom Smith
This apportionment would make the rural states less important than they are now, but as James Madison might have said, them's the breaks. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
Attorneys for 57-year-old Bobby James Moore argue the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest court in the state, disregarded existing medical standards in favor of outdated ones when it decided Moore wasn’t mentally disabled. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
Attorneys for 57-year-old Bobby James Moore argue the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest court in the state, disregarded existing medical standards in favor of outdated ones when it decided Moore wasn’t mentally disabled. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by cbroden
Attorneys for 57-year-old Bobby James Moore argue the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest court in the state, disregarded existing medical standards in favor of outdated ones when it decided Moore wasn’t mentally disabled. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]