Search for: "John R. Held" Results 4261 - 4280 of 7,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2012, 7:05 am by Michelle Leder
There, under director pay was the disclosure that John L. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:50 am by David Oxenford
  At the same time, the court held that allowing commercial advertising would undermine the purpose of public broadcasting to provide educational and niche programming. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
This is a question the Court of Appeal considered in its recent judgment in James Butler v John Smith. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:57 pm by Barger & Wolen LLP
Vice President, Government Affairs, Coventry; and John McCarroll, Vice President-General Counsel, Q Capital Strategies. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
This afternoon, I participated in a debate with Rick Esenberg at the Marquette University Law School. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:37 am by Barger & Wolen LLP
Vice President, Government Affairs, Coventry; and John McCarroll, Vice President-General Counsel, Q Capital Strategies. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:57 am
According to Medpagetoday.com, among 40,391 medication orders issued during a one-year period, only 4% were accepted, reported Amy Knight, MD, of Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center in Baltimore. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:52 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Department of Health v IC, John Healey MP and Nicholas Cecil (EA/2011/0286 & 287). [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm by Andy Dorchak
Florence sued jail officials, arguing that “the searches were unreasonable because he was being held for failure to pay a fine, which is not a crime in New Jersey. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:44 am by Stephen Jenei
A networking reception will be held Friday evening, April 27, 2012. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
It allows them to be sure in how they’re reaching their verdict, in a way,” noted the Chairman of the Illinois Supreme Court Rules Committee, John B. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 9:25 am by Christina Burnett
California (1948), which held unconstitutional a provision of California’s Alien Land Law that discriminated against owners of property bought by parents who were ineligible to become U.S. citizens. [read post]