Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 13,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am
Sivit v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia are next in line with five each. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:52 pm
As you can imagine, the line isn't what you'd call bright. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:21 pm
See Ward v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
The climate change crisis challenges people throughout the world to invent and implement innovative ways to mitigate and thwart climate changing causes and effects. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
This office has decided not to file a brief in Snyder v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Indeed, in the ongoing debate between people who think the constitutional regime legitimately changes in more ways than Article V imagines and people who think that legitimate change comes only through Article V, the Reconstruction Amendments might seem to be a powerful resource for the latter perspective. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 11:37 am
Kennedy made in an opinion just last Term (Bond v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Ever since Bush v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
The officers drove past Washington Park, where a crowd of people were drinking and shooting off fireworks. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:19 am
There is an interesting pointtaken about an omission to act operating as an assurance, and here (reading between the lines) HHJ Matthews appears to have applied (at [102]) something like the probanda in Willmott v Barber, although this is not expressly cited in the judgment and would be rather odd given its lack of authority in modern estoppel doctrine. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
One line of decisions offers an explanation. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
You cannot expect to utilise AI in your products or services without considering privacy, data protection and how you will safeguard people’s rights. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
The bottom line is that Atlas suffers a categorical prohibition of its constitutionally-protected speech, as well as an indefinite content-based prior restraint on that speech. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
First, SLP joins folks around the globe including everybody here in blogspace in congratulating CNSA and the people of China on the success of the lunar probe Chang'e I. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 am
In Magner v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm
" Legg v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:58 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
