Search for: "MATTER OF A R"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 114,171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2021, 9:19 am
The Supreme Court has issued its ruling in Arthrex v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:19 am
The Court said: “[R]egardless whether the Government is correct that at-will removal by the Secretary would cure the constitutional problem, review by the Director better reflects the structure of supervision within the PTO and the nature of APJs’ duties. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:27 am
Thus, under the rule, it does not matter if the bank was precommitted to selling the loan to a nonbank, which undertook the design, marketing, and underwriting of the loan. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:00 am
After reviewing §516 of the MCARE Act, under which the standards by which a hospital may be held vicariously liable for the negligence of an independent contractor physician based upon ostensible agency, and applying those standards to the record before the court, Judge Terrence R. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:35 am
The judgment is a mammoth 85 pages long and deals with issues of essentiality and validity based on lack of inventive step and added matter. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 4:09 am
Here's what she wrote that led to that campaign against her — from her blog, back in 2019 : "I have no issue with somebody who feels more comfortable expressing themselves as if they are the other sex (or in whatever way they please for that matter). [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:43 am
"Running out of film, she insisted, was worse than running out of speed. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 2:18 am
Xu Huang, Wuhan University Institute of International Law 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 10:37 pm
No matter the level of deference we extend to the City, the inclusion of a formal system of entirely discretionary exceptions in section 3.21 renders the contractual nondiscrimination requirement not generally applicable. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 8:44 pm
Ultimately, I'm not sure it matters. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:35 pm
The majority allowed the matter to proceed, despite the representation order being provided past limitations, because the union defended and treated the action as valid, and the matter was ready for trial. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
At the same time, conservatives have themselves long been split on such matters, and for understandable reasons. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 10:06 am
The fact that Blue Mountain styled a separate claim for violation of the corporate opportunity doctrine, without labeling it as a breach of fiduciary duty, was really just a matter of semantics, the court held. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 7:55 am
"Why the Individual Mandate Part of the New Obamacare Case Matters," June 14, 2018. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:12 pm
Again, she doesn't discuss how those other provisions should be interpreted as an original matter. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
Walker, Avery White, Michael Neblo, Jeremy Kessler, Charles Sabel, Cass R. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 5:07 pm
The history shows (1) that the public health power, including the power to quarantine, was traditionally understood—and still is understood—as a function of state police power; (2) that the federal quarantine power has both expanded and contracted; (3) that historically the federal quarantine power was limited to a discrete action, such as inspection and sanitation at a port of entry, as well as detention for the duration of a disease's incubation period; (4) that although the… [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:34 pm
These three words, “from the outset”, are words that matter in national proceedings. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:10 pm
There the Court ruled that as a matter of public policy it was not equitable for a grandparent who acted out of generosity to take in a child to be held liable for support of that child. [read post]
