Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 4261 - 4280 of 5,814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
§ 157(b) – in particular subsection (b)(2)(C) which provides that counterclaims to proofs of claim are core proceedings. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
The model and actress Anna Nicole Smith had filed for bankruptcy in Los Angeles after the death of her billionaire husband, J. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. 2011 NY Slip Op 51142(U) ; Decided on June 22, 2011 ; Supreme Court, Nassau County ; DeStefano, J. we see an upside-down mirror image of the usual legal malpractice case. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by heralddigital
(j)  The audio-visual recording of the proceedings shall be made under the supervision and control of the trial court which may issue supplementary directives, as the exigency requires, including the suspension or revocation of the grant of application by the media entities. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:33 am
Floyd J’s latest decision in the matter was handed down yesterday. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:28 am by Russ Bensing
   Thirteen months after her marriage to octagenarian oil magnate J. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:02 am by war
Wilcox J was not prepared to order damages at a reasonable royalty level because, as is typically the case, there was no way Autodesk would have licensed Cheung or, for that matter, that Cheung would have paid for a licence from Autodesk. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by Roy Ginsburg
Plaintiffs bear a significant burden of proof As a threshold matter, the Court emphasized, for the first time, that Rule 23 “does not set forth a mere pleading standard. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:04 am by Madeleine Reardon, 1 KBW.
’ The application under the Convention was granted by Pauffley J, and the mother’s appeal to the Court of Appeal was refused. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
United Kingdom International Extradition Treaty with the United States EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND March 31, 2003, Date-Signed April 26, 2007, Date-In-Force Mr. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  As a substantive matter, there’s not a whole lot of overlap between Dukes and what we do here. [read post]
  Or as the Inner House held, was assessment of the validity and weight of the Appellants’ criticisms of the 2009 Act essentially a matter of governmental and political judgment with which the Court should not interfere? [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm by Dan Bushell
The Basics of the Decision   The thrust of the Dukes decision can be gleaned from this comment by J. [read post]