Search for: "MILLER v. STATE"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 5,143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
(Ars Technica) Get your e-book on the iPad (and keep the royalties) (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D California: Facebook preliminarily wins copyright lawsuit over third party app: Miller v Facebook (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Utah: Jury confirms Novell owns Unix copyrights – Linux remains free: SCO Group v Novell (eLegal) (Tangible IP) (Ars Technica) (Eyes on IP) US Copyright – Lawsuits and… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
” We will be watching for the Ninth Circuit’s decision and will report it to you. - Randy Miller and Sava Berhane [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:32 am
In Doe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
Miller, Second Amendment Equilibria, 116 Nw. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:03 am
State Court Judge Raymond S. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:14 pm
And how do you square Terry v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
Miller's contention that a finding of improper influence instead of fabrication fits better with the facts of the case. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 7:10 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:39 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
Because the Administration hopes to take shelter in a cryptic 1948 decision, Hirota v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
Miller, 44 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. [read post]
22 Mar 2025, 11:28 am
And at the center of these human drama, again in the United States, lie the courts and the actors around whom the virtual perfection of law can be incarnated and applied to the affairs of human individuals and their power/rights/duty arrangements. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General iSlate, iTablet, IP! [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
Miller, 389 U.S. 429, 442 (1968) (field preemption involves "a domain of exclusively federal competence") (emphasis added). [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
Evans-Feder, 63 F.3d 217 (3d Cir. 1995); Miller v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:22 am
That decision applied to earlier cases the 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
While Davidon Homes v. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 7:25 am
” Counsel further stated that the blog post was relevant because the plaintiff worked a desk job. [read post]
