Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 70,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2010, 9:02 pm
By Sherri Oslick -- About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:33 am
Here are links to articles in today's Times Leader out of Wilkes-Barre by reporter Terrie Morgan-Besecker and Mark Guydish.It appears that the case against former Luzerne County Judge Mark Ciavarella comes down to whether the jury believes the cash payments Ciavarella received amounted to "kickbacks" as alleged by the prosecution or a "finder's fee" as alleged by the defense.Here are the… [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 7:14 am
A number of Supreme Court justices over history have stepped down to take on jobs that in some cases they felt were even more consequential. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 3:33 am
Each case must be decided on its own facts.The Goods: Examining Attorney Julie Thomas Veppumthara submitted excerpts from some 20 websites for businesses owning a brewery and a distillery. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:55 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union's ruling in Case C-307/10 Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (better known by the name of the trade mark applied for in that case, IP TRANSLATOR) last year does involve European law, it's true. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:26 am
[The TTAB had made that same finding in a different case involving that mark]. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:29 am
" In any case, there was no evidence of the extent of use of the involved marks, or whether there have been meaningful opportunities for confusion to have occurred.Finally, applicant pointed to a third-party registration for MANHATTAN LOFT, now expired, which co-existed with the cited registration. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:54 am
The Board disagreed because applicant had objected to the admission of the evidence that opposer sought to rely on.Preclusion: Applicant pointed to a prior TTAB decision [TTABlogged here] as being dispositive here, but the Board quickly dismissed that contention because the services of the applicant were not the same in the two cases: in the prior case, applicant sought to register a "two chicken" mark for "restaurant services," not franchising… [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 2:51 am
The record in this case establishes that cigars and alcoholic beverages are not only produced and offered for sale by third parties under the identical mark, but they are also complementary products that are marketed together for simultaneous consumption. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:13 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.July 7, 2020 - 2 PAM: In re Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., Serial No. 87935794 [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark CPLC for various health care services in class 44, in view of the identical mark registered as a certification mark for "perinatal loss care services"].July 9, 2020 - 1 PM: Biogrand Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 9:52 am
The recent Eastern District of Pennsylvania case of Bragg vs. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:08 pm
Stay tuned for an update when that case is decided. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:53 am
[Note: The TTABlog looked at this case in its early stages (here), principally noting the lack of an appropriate apostrophe in applicant's mark.]Likelihood of Confusion: Applicant admitted that the Yankees had been referred to as the "Evil Empire" prior to the filing date of the opposed application. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 3:31 am
When clearing a mark for clothing, do you check jewelry marks? [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:03 am
But an agreement that overcomes problems in the UK won't necessarily help when a conflict arises elsewhere.In a recent case, Ornua Co-operative Limited, formerly The Irish Dairy Board Co-operative Limited v Tindale & Stanton Ltd España SL the European Union's Court of Justice had to deal with a conflict between two Irish dairy companies, the owners of the well-known KERRYGOLD trade mark and the owners of the less well-known KERRYMAID trade mark. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 4:08 am
It was up to Nike to prove its case. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:45 am
The appellate court stated that it was "not suggesting that a standard character mark encompasses all possible design elements," leaving it "for future cases to determine the appropriate method of comparing design marks with standard character marks. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:43 pm
Yet the marks in the present case were not identical and corresponded only in their use of the word 'bull' - and the word 'bull' used in De Vries' sign was but one element in the word 'Bulldog', and was linked to a completely different image. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:26 am
" Allegiance admitted in its answer that its goods are not made of silk and that the marks of the parties are similar. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:44 pm
Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases, Lamone v. [read post]
