Search for: "Million v State"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 24,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2016, 4:20 pm
With the federal government owning and controlling millions of acres of land, particularly in the western states, business activities conducted on federal land are subject to close scrutiny and often require that a relevant permit be obtained and maintained. [read post]
4 May 2016, 11:15 pm
(The Doe Run Resources Corp v The Fidelity & Casulty Co. of New York, case number G050689, in the court of Appeal of the State of California, Fourth Appellate District) [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 8:32 pm
The July 27, 2007 opinion in Mohammed Salem El-Hadad v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:08 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
In FTC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
In the discussion of Zions First Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 11:55 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
District Court Invalidates Merck's Formulation Patent on Pepcid Complete, Relying on KSR v. Teleflex
6 Jun 2007, 9:00 pm
McNeil-PPC et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:20 pm
When Hawaii was annexed by the United States in 1898, the Hawaiian government ceded almost 2 million acres of land to the United States Government, most of which was later transferred to the State of Hawaii in the act admitting Hawaii as a state in 1959. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 7:54 pm
Judgment was handed down on 22 November 2019 (Wagner v Nine Network Australia PL & Ors [2019] QSC 284). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:06 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:01 am
But the court reduced the damages award from $2.5 million to $125,000, ruling that the plaintiff's damages were merely "garden-variety" and not substantial.The case is Saber v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Orin Kerr has published a thought-provoking response to my post several days ago critiquing the New York State $450 million civil fraud verdict against Donald Trump. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:45 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument on the controversial issue in the highly publicized case of Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:49 pm
Here Naranjo raised 1.5 million dollars through this fraud. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:48 am
First, this blog by the “Activist Investor” stated a belief that CEOs shouldn’t serve on the board at all, much less serve as the board chair. [read post]
