Search for: "Moring v. State" Results 4261 - 4280 of 131,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
More than a dozen years ago, Peter Mahler wrote about one such case, Barasch v Williams Real Estate Co. (33 Misc 3d 1219[A] [Sup Ct, NY County 2011]). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Victoria is a state in southeast Australia. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
The Privacy & Information Security Law Blog has more information. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:56 pm by Donald Dinnie
Vaw Belingsings (Pty) Limited Liquidation v MKD Properties (Pty) Limited [2023] ZAGPPHC 2013 This blog was co-authored by Thabo Kolele, Candidate Attorney. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Commitment Rule is a further development of the proposal we submitted to the Secretariat of UNCITRAL Working Group V (Insolvency) in an open letter on September 14, 2023. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
My point in this essay is much more modest. [read post]
” Additionally, SFFA asserts that West Point’s policies violate “every” principle from Students For Fair Admissions v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:46 am by Etienne Farnoux
More generally, the case-by-case approach allows a more nuanced (although also more complex) analysis of the (de)colonial character of current Western PIL standards. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm by Mark Ashton
In so doing the panel opinion states that it is only after assessing that a party’s income is “inappropriate” that a court may turn to the matter of whether the person could/should be earning more. [read post]