Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 1:47 pm
Burnley Training College Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home … Admin Court: Refusal of licence for Burnley college under Home Secretary’s policy to prevent abuse by overseas students was unlawful. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:12 am
S.H. and Others v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
In Greg Barnett v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
In Greg Barnett v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
Whereas the latter had stated that if Jinse entered into an insolvency procedure, that would trigger a right to rescind and therefore the refund guarantee (Article XII.3), the bonds did not. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:22 am
See Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:56 am
Great Atlantic & Pacific Co. of Canada (1999), 48 O.R. (3d) 228 (C.A.): "Life goes on" (para. 60). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:44 pm
The CAFC has largely eviscerated §112, ¶2 over time. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:15 pm
In addition to the requirements under CPR Part 16.4 and PD para 8.2(8) which state that the Particulars of Claim should include the facts relied on in relation to the plea of damage, the BBC also raised a number of matters relating to Tesla’s case in support of why this pleading was “wholly inadequate”. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:13 am
My old friend Alejandro Manevich, now an attorney in Toronto, writes in with the following on today’s development in the extradition case of Abdullah Khadr: I thought your readers may be interested in this morning’s order by the Supreme Court of Canada denying leave to appeal in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:49 am
” (United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
by its mRNA (the encoding gene) in T-cell and B-cell lymphomas, and (v) the information that Neutrokine-? [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Sections 35 and 35A have been considered recently by this Court in Salem Advocates Bar Association v. [read post]
