Search for: "State v. House" Results 4261 - 4280 of 28,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Nor did Lord Malcom, who did not consider it “necessary to dwell” on the current state of the law concerning whether such a right existed. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
R (on the application of M) (FC) (Respondent) v Slough Borough Council  [2008] UKHL 52 is a House of Lords case concerning Local Authority obligations under the National Assistance Act 1948, and specifically when the authority is obliged to arrange and pay for accommodation. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:23 am by NL
The cases are: Dragic v LB Wandsworth High Court (QB) 21 January 2011 QB/2010/0485 Dharmaraj v LB Hounslow Court of Appeal, January 24, 2011 B5/2010/0201 Dragic v Wandsworth This was a second appeal from a County Court s.24 Housing Act 1996 appeal. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:23 am by NL
The cases are: Dragic v LB Wandsworth High Court (QB) 21 January 2011 QB/2010/0485 Dharmaraj v LB Hounslow Court of Appeal, January 24, 2011 B5/2010/0201 Dragic v Wandsworth This was a second appeal from a County Court s.24 Housing Act 1996 appeal. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:11 pm
Today's Supreme Court docket update indicated that Foerster v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm by Robert Chesney
  Now we have a Supreme Court decision (United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:10 am by Vanessa Sauter
Sarah Grant provided an update on the United States v. al-Nashiri proceedings. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 9:35 am by Giles Peaker
Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd v TM (2021) EWCA Civ 1890 We saw in Taylor v Slough Borough Council (2020) EWHC 3520 (Ch) (our note) that in possession claims where a defence of breach of public sector equality duty was raised, the courts would be prepared to accept subsequent compliance (even after the issue of proceedings) as ‘remedying’ the breach. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:37 am by Giles Peaker
But then s.167 – no re-entry or forfeiture for small amounts, expressly states “long lease” has the meaning given by sections 76 and 77 of this Act, except that a shared ownership lease is a long lease whatever the tenant’s total share, And, of course, forfeiture doesn’t apply to an assured tenancy, as it is expressly ruled out by Housing Act 1988. [read post]