Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 4261 - 4280
of 51,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2017, 1:33 pm
This is how Timothy Dyk, long before becoming a judge on the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:16 am
In Cisson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:45 pm
See Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:16 am
In Cisson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 6:05 pm
In Provost v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:16 am
In Cisson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
As long as I am on the topic of the Federalists, I might as well repeat a question to Rick Garnett that I asked him on our panel at the Federalist Society - to whit, why don't good Federalist Society members support the Court's decisions in Grutter, Kelo, and Locke v Davey? [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:03 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:20 pm
As noted in my last blog post, the California Supreme Court just reversed the appellate court decision in the case of Steiner v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
The post SCOUTING Trademark Infringement: Girl Scouts v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Why risk a long prison term just to add more millions to a fortune already too vast to spend in one lifetime? [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am
North Carolina, the burned-out brake light case in which the state supreme court ruled that an investigative stop may be based on an officer’s mistake of law, so long as the mistake is reasonable. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:24 am
If the state had legislated reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions intended to reduce conflicts of rights, as long as the expression was not unduly burdened, that should not be considered a Speech Right violation. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:50 am
This ruling is significant for defendants who have long encountered plaintiffs hiding the ball to avoid removal. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:50 am
This ruling is significant for defendants who have long encountered plaintiffs hiding the ball to avoid removal. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
On the issue of confidentiality in the SEP context, the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf stated, in the Sisvel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate on August 2, 1979. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Yet in two prominent cases, Kennedy v. [read post]
