Search for: "State v. M. V." Results 4261 - 4280 of 29,347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 1:47 pm by Steve Bainbridge
If Chancellor Chandler were to broadly invalidate poison pills in the Airgas v Air Products case, in which I'm told by a couple of reporters that a decision is expected tomorrow, however, that would go to the head of the list. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:44 pm
  That way you get maximum buy-in.But even though that's always been my theoretical take on things, I'm seriously dubious of my ability to actually pull it off. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 1:15 pm by Steve Hall
  Because of the sheer volume, I'm going to limit excerpts, but those interested in the issues raised in Graham v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
Take, for example, a hypothetical statute that says that it's illegal "to shoot a flying bird" within 500 feet of a state-owned drone. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:24 pm
  Not the most populous county in the state, to be sure. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 11:17 am
That last subjective mental state seems important to me. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Which states, in its entirety:"The Attorney General asserts Mumin [the shooter] did not shoot more than three rounds because he was wounded by the officers’ return fire. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:28 am
 But I'm sure that the department would say that that's exactly what they did. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 11:36 am
 The legal reasoning is coherent.Yet there's still something about this opinion that just seems wrong.I'm not a huge fan of unregulated machine guns floating around the United States, so I get why ATF wants to know when an existing machine gun -- created before they were banned -- gets transferred. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm by Apple Sulit-Peralejo
  However, recently, on December 23, 2009, a trial Court in Hudson County entered a decision in the A.G.R. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:45 pm by cdw
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. [read post]