Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 4261 - 4280 of 71,787
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Opinion No. 20190748-CA Filed December 24, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Michael Edwards No. 134701192 Jonathan Hibshman, Marco Brown, and Rodney R. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:45 am by Unknown
Dept. of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Jan. 2021) [text via ReliefWeb] Roadmap to Recovery: A Path Forward after the Remain in Mexico Program - Executive Summary (HIAS, Jan. 2021) [text] The State of the Immigration Courts: Trump Leaves Biden 1.3 Million Case Backlog in Immigration Courts (TRAC, Jan. 2021) [text] Journal articles: "The Asylum Search: How the Supreme… [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:08 am by Kevin M. Finson
Both marks were used for apparel and related retail services (North 61 LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The relevant constitutional provision, in Section 2 of Article II, states that the President “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Quoted in Psychologist warns that impeachment is now damaging America's mental state, Washington Times (Jan. 23, 2020). [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 20 and Thursday 21 January the Supreme Court will hear the case of R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 11:54 am
Common Law of Foreign Official Immunity Laurence R. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 9:17 am by Keith E. Whittington
Why hand argumentative ammunition to Trump's defense team if you do not have to do so? [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Many leading civil procedure cases do involve discrimination, such as the hugely important Ashcroft v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And, although rational basis applies, it's not the "sub-rational basis" that a case last year implied is called for during a pandemic under Jacobson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:05 pm by Greg Mersol
” Moreover, when deciding whether to certify a case as a collective action, the Fifth Circuit stated that courts should examine issues related to the merits of the plaintiff’s claims and whether the members of the putative collective are similarly situated with regard to the factors that will be relevant to determining the merits of the plaintiff’s claims. [read post]