Search for: "States v. State"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 258,408
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 12:25 pm
Ilya Somin (George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School) has posted Brown, Democracy, and Foot Voting (American Journal of Law and Equality, Symposium on the 70th Anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:46 am
” Case No. 01001976380 | The People of the State of California v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:44 am
Seilkop v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:47 am
Machinists v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
(Or at least the best one that doesn't take up 20,000+ words.)The California Supreme Court has to wade into all this in deciding this opinion, which holds that, in this particular context, the required mental state of "knowing" is belied by a good faith belief in the legality of one's conduct. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:01 am
The decision overrules Blasband v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:47 am
In Pulsifer v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
Dep’t of Labor had explicitly directed states to NOT charge administrative concealment penalties for PUA benefits and BEFORE the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:47 am
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard): On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:51 am
Garland, 593 U.S. 155, 171–72 (2021); United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:42 am
Bell v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:29 am
Without a federal law, individuals must rely on a patchwork of state laws, and Tennessee has taken the lead in expanding its right of publicity laws. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:43 am
In this case, the New York Court of Appeals chips away a little further on eyewitness testimony and holds that the criminal conviction needs to be vacated.The case is People v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:38 am
Immanuel Baptist Church v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:20 am
v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:12 am
P’ship v. [read post]