Search for: "Steven Powers" Results 4261 - 4280 of 5,851
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, not knowing what ten to the third power is would be ignorance of a fundamental mathematical concept (unless you were somehow taught this concept without hearing the phrase “to the Xth power,” which is unlikely). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
If you suspect abuse or neglect, report it and contact Steven Peck's Premier Legal toll free at 1.866.999.9085 to talk to an experienced California Elder Abuse Attorney and visit us on-line at www.premierlegal.org [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm by Susan Weiswasser
Jackson, the Court held that federal courts cannot hear a party's challenge to the enforceability of an arbitration agreement unless the party specifically challenges the arbitrator's power to hear that dispute. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:24 pm by carie
"As the senior justice, Stevens has the power to decide which justice writes the opinion when the chief justice is not in the majority. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
He has used that power to build coalitions and has become the undisputed leader of the resistance against the conservatives on the Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
What is happening inside of our nursing homes and inside of our physical rehabilitation centers today would shock the average person. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm by Lisa McElroy
  Because the President oversees this component of federal law, the Act limiting removal to cases involving good cause was unconstitutional in restricting his power to do so. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
United States broadly read judges’ power to order restitution (a “conservative” outcome) by a majority of Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor, over the dissent of Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, and Kennedy. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:30 am by Nathaniel Grow
Henry Fetter has written an interesting piece for The Atlantic, looking back at retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens' work as associate counsel to the Monopoly Power Subcommittee of the House of Representatives' Judiciary Committee, and in particular the role he played during the 1951 Celler Hearings regarding the antitrust status of Major League Baseball. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:33 am by Jamie LaPlante
 Justice Stevens, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, wrote the opinion for the Court. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm by James Bickford
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board “is an important separation-of-powers decision that portends a major doctrinal shift in the court’s approach to separation-of-powers issues or a nothing-burger that does not provide any meaningful relief even to the parties that challenged the law. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:44 am by UChicagoLaw
  Despite Justice Stevens’s cautions about “[t]he malleability and elusiveness of history,” a strong current of history-as-objective-social-science runs through the decision. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 am by Alison LaCroix - Guest
  Despite Justice Stevens’s cautions about “[t]he malleability and elusiveness of history,” a strong current of history-as-objective-social-science runs through the decision. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:54 am by Broc Romanek
" Yesterday was a big day for SCOTUS as it was Justice Stevens last day and many in the audience sported a bow-tie in his honor. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:48 am by admin
Refrain from the bromide tactics others use and begin to conduct yourself with poise, power and differentiation. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:39 pm by Jay D. Dean
  Both Justice Stevens, who retired Monday at age 90, and Justice Scalia, who remains on the Court, concurred in that judgment. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:47 pm by Kimberly Harding - Guest
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (separation of powers), McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:10 pm by Ilya Somin
UPDATE #2: I should note that Justice Stevens’ separate dissent in McDonald makes a similar argument to Breyer’s (pp. 35–37 of the slip opinion). [read post]