Search for: "United States v. Alter" Results 4261 - 4280 of 4,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
The shareholders appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Guest Blogger
As I have argued elsewhere, [3] IP laws are deliberate government interventions in the market to try to shape how people participate in that market, encouraging new creation by rewarding it with above-market returns and discouraging imitation by imposing damages or even barring it altogether.Once we understand IP laws as government social policies that seek to alter market outcomes, we can start to think of those laws as part of a broader tapestry of government rules that affect… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am by David Post
  If you’re interested, see chapter 10 (“Governing Cyberspace II: Names”) of my book In Search of Jefferson’s Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace for a detailed account. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 7:54 pm by Robert A. Epstein
Neither party shall travel with the minor Children outside of the United States without the prior written consent of the other party. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 7:54 pm by Robert A. Epstein
Neither party shall travel with the minor Children outside of the United States without the prior written consent of the other party. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 7:54 pm by Robert A. Epstein
Neither party shall travel with the minor Children outside of the United States without the prior written consent of the other party. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm by Michael Lowe
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
"Now, imagine you are the CEO or General Counsel of a telcom company that has been assisting the NSA in electronic surveillance for two years, assured that what appear to be your violations of FISA do not subject you to legal exposure because you have been relying on the certification "by the Attorney General of the United States that no warrant or court order is required by law. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
One of these items is United States v. [read post]