Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 6,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2013, 2:50 pm
For example, in Roe v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 11:53 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am
Patrik Jonsson in the Christian Science Monitor wonders if this isn't a "turning point" for Joe.But if the court ruling represents a victory for immigration advocates and a legal reversal for Arpaio, it's also clear that, even before the ruling, Arpaio had been losing support among more educated white voters even as opposition against him had galvanized among ascendant Hispanic voters, the Arizona Capital Times newspaper reported recently. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:12 am
Gans discusses data reflecting high voter turnout by African Americans in recent elections and argues that such data is a reason to “celebrate, not gut” Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the constitutionality of which the Court is currently considering in Shelby County v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:50 am
In an ACLU case currently pending before the Supreme Court, Arizona v. the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, ACLU clients are challenging the State of Arizona's attempt to impose additional barriers to voter registration beyond the requirements of the standardized federal voter registration form. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:54 am
Remanded.Case Name: PAUL ROCK, DARI QUIRK & ERNEST KAWA v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:34 am
The ACLU is direct counsel in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:42 am
" Petitioner had testified that she resided at a City address and that the City address was listed on various documents, including her voter registration records and her driver's license. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:28 am
Abbott Taxpayers for Accountable School Bond Spending v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am
With the Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:02 pm
In July 2012 the Federal Court rejected an application by Dr Kelly to have the action struck out on the basis that the Federal Court did not have jurisdiction (Crosby v Kelly [2012] FCAFC 96). [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:54 am
The Texas case, Fisher v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:22 am
One might joke that Monday’s order in Boyer v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
In McBurney v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
A trial court in New Jersey, however, held, in a 1976 case, M.T. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:22 pm
By Andrew DelaneyTrudell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court said in Karcher v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 12:08 pm
This is a staggering devotion of resources -- really quite shocking -- devoted to fighting about whether Hoover High School (here in San Diego) gets to put up some lights for its football field.It's very plausible that Proposition S, which was approved by the voters in 2008 and authorized up to $2.1 billion dollars of school bonds, didn't expressly authorize this particular project at Hoover. [read post]
